Scheuermann: Vote coming on Stowe withdrawal from school district

by Heidi Scheuermann (R-Stowe) Following the passage of Act 46 in 2015, an extremely bad piece of legislation calling for mergers (some forced) of school districts in a misguided attempt to bring cost containment and greater educational opportunities to Vermont students, the Stowe and Elmore/Morristown School Boards, with the support of the communities, worked collaboratively and unanimously agreed to fight against a forced merger. After exhaustive research since 2013 on the impact of a forced merger in our communities, both boards understood that a forced merger would have a negative impact on the education provided to their communities.

Unfortunately, for what in my view were purely political reasons, the State Board of Education at the time went against the recommendation of the State Agency of Education, and more importantly, against the will of all three communities, and ordered the forced merger of our two school districts.

Since that time, it has become abundantly clear that the merger has not worked. It has neither brought greater educational opportunities or better outcomes to our students, nor brought any cost savings. In fact, the real shame is that, in many cases, it has caused a clear deterioration of our educational opportunities and quality.

To be clear, the upcoming vote in Stowe to withdraw from this forced merger is not a Stowe vs. Morristown/Elmore issue.

After all, we are neighbors. We are friends. We are coworkers. We are family. This issue is about what is good for ALL of our communities and ALL of our students.

Do Elmore and Morristown really want Stowe voters determining the future of their schools, the education of their students, and the critical investments needed in both?

Does Stowe really want Morristown and Elmore determining the future of their schools, the education of their students, and the critical investments needed in both?

This upcoming vote to dissolve the forced merger is simple: It is the only way to return to the education model that was working well for all of us – two distinct districts providing high quality education under one Supervisory Union. This upcoming vote is the opportunity to hand our local schools back to our local communities, while at the same time continue to work together under one Supervisory Union as we had done for so long. And, it is the only way we can ensure local control and self-determination into the future.

Make no mistake, this vote on May 11th could be the only opportunity we have, as the door might very well close for us soon. With an affirmative vote, though, we can start bringing this harmful chapter to a close, and begin writing a new chapter together for all of our students in Stowe, Morristown and Elmore.

For those with questions about the legality of the vote or how we move forward after the vote and subsequent approval of the withdrawal by the other two communities, I am confident in both.

First, the Articles of Agreement provided to the newly merged district by the State Agency of Education (AOE), approved by the voters on February 26, 2019, and then approved by the State Board of Education, make clear that withdrawal is allowed when the article is approved by a majority of the voters, as long as the article was presented pursuant to 16 V.S.A § 724 (withdrawal by member town in year two or after).

While the Agency of Education has a different interpretation of this, many other attorneys, including our town's attorney, have come to the exact opposite conclusion. Those I've spoken with are firm in their belief that not allowing a dissolution of LSUU is a clear violation of our Vermont Constitutional rights of equal protection and common benefits. Does it make sense that only those towns that voluntarily merged and received three years of lowered taxes are the only ones who can leave their union, yet those towns that pursued the option of an Alternative Governance Structure cannot? I'm not a lawyer, but that seems like unequal treatment to me, and it does so to many attorneys with whom I have spoken.

With regard to what the structure will likely be if Stowe withdraws from the merger and the State Board of Education approves it, from what I understand, the Town Attorney inquired of the Agency of Education that very question and was told that “it would more than likely be the result that if Stowe withdrew, it would remain in the Supervisory Union.” This is good news, as the very purpose of this withdrawal is to revert to the structure we had in place prior to the merger – two distinct, high-performing districts under one Supervisory Union.

Please join me in returning our local schools to our local communities. Join me in ensuring high academic standards return to the elementary schools, middle schools, and high schools of Stowe, Morristown and Elmore. Please join me in voting YES on May 11th to dissolve the forced merger of the Stowe and Elmore/Morristown School Districts.

LSUU FACILITY BEST USE STUDY

As you consider the upcoming vote to dissolve the merger, I urge you to review this recently released Lamoille South Unified Union Facility Best Use Study.

After reviewing the first 79 pages of the report, spend some real time on the 5 options outlined starting on page 80.

Is this what all of us had hoped when we were forced to merge into one school district?

First off, four of the five options have the closure of the Elmore School. Frankly, in my view, Stowe should not be deciding whether or not the Elmore School should be closed.

Other options laid out in the report include:

  1. Elementary school students from across all three towns merged into one school or the other according to grade level rather than town (that means increased busing/transportation);

  2. Using either middle/high school as a merged middle school and a merged high school with students across all three towns merged into the school according to grade level rather than town (more busing/transportation);

  3. Closure of Stowe Elementary School;

  4. Closure of Morristown Elementary School; constructing a centrally located high schools for all high school students across all three communities.

As I said above, the upcoming vote to dissolve the merger is not a Stowe v. Elmore/Morristown issue. This is about what is best for ALL of our communities and ALL of our students.

I do not believe that the closure of any of our local schools - the hearts and souls of our communities - is something most in our communities want to see.

VERMONT FORWARD

A ROADMAP TO REOPENING

On Tuesday, April 6th, Governor Phil Scott released "Vermont Forward - A Roadmap to Reopening" - a reopening guide for a phased return to unrestricted travel, business operations, and event gatherings by the Fourth of July!

This is great news. We are in the home stretch.

While the full plan is a general roadmap, the Agency of Commerce and Community Development will lay out full guidance as each step forward is taken. All guidance updates will now be made available in this central location.

To be clear, the Vermont Forward Plan depends on the cooperation of all of us as Vermonters, as it uses vaccination rates as the key milestone for transitioning Vermont businesses to more general, universal guidance to prevent the spread of COVID-19; modifying travel guidance; and when gathering size can increase between now and July 4.

I have laid out below the Anticipated Reopening Timeline, but as you review it, keep in mind the following:

UNIVERSAL GUIDANCE: Universal guidance has five main tenets: Stay home if you’re sick, wear a mask, ensure six-foot spaces and uncrowded places, practice good hygiene, and know the travel restrictions.

GROUP A: Low contact, short duration, outdoor and controlled environment

GROUP B: Long duration or close contact environments

ANTICIPATED TIMELINE

STEP 1 - APRIL 9

Business Operations

Group A Sectors:

Move to required universal guidance

Cross State Travel

No quarantine required with negative test within 3 days of arrival in or return to the state

Masks and Physical Distancing

Required when in the presence of those outside your household.

STEP 2 - MAY 1

Business Operations

Group B Sectors:

Move to required universal guidance

Gatherings and Events

Indoor: 1 unvaccinated person per 100 sq ft up to 150, plus any number of vaccinated people

Outdoor: 300, plus any number of vaccinated people

Masks and Social Distancing

Required when in the presence of those outside your household.

STEP 3 - JUNE 1

Cross State Travel

No quarantine or testing requirements

Gatherings and Events

Indoor: 1 unvaccinated person per 50 sq ft up to 300, plus any number of vaccinated people

Outdoor: 900, plus any number of vaccinated people

Masks and Physical Distancing

Required when in the presence of those outside your household.

JULY 4TH - HAPPY FOURTH OF JULY!!

Business Operations

Universal guidance encouraged for all sectors

Gatherings and Events

No capacity restrictions

Masks and Physical Distancing

Encouraged

Again, this timeline is dependent upon vaccination rates. And, updates as this progresses can be found here.

As always, please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns about our work, or about the industry in general.

TOURISM AND HOSPITALITY

The Vermont Legislative Tourism Caucus continues its work in earnest.

As the legislative session approaches its final weeks, the caucus is honing in on the important issues being considered, and what we might be able to do as individual members and as a Caucus to advocate for the industry.

For that reason, our last three meetings have focused on some of the continued recovery initiatives and funding issues.

March 26, 2021 Legislative Tourism Caucus Meeting

Governor Phil Scott's Consumer Stimulus Program Proposal

Guest: Heather Pelham, Commissioner, Vermont Department of Tourism and Marketing

The Governor's Consumer Stimulus Program did not get the love in deliberations in the House for which the Administration had hoped, so it was not included in the House version of the legislation. That said, the House version did include a $2.5 million additional one-time investment in Tourism Marketing, and I was certainly pleased with that development.

At this time, it is expected that the Administration is working to include the Governor's Consumer Stimulus Program in the Senate version of the bill.

April 2, 2021 Legislative Tourism Caucus Meeting

Outdoor Recreation - Status & Update; Gov. Scott's $10 Million Investment Proposal

Guests:

Michael Snyder, Commissioner, Vermont Department of Forest, Parks, and Recreation

Kelly Ault, Vermont Outdoor Business Alliance

This was an extremely informative meeting, at which we learned a great deal about how the industry is doing in Vermont, and what we as a Legislature can do to ensure it continues to grow and thrive.

One of the keys is clearly the approval of the $10 million one-time investment that the Governor has proposed. I am pleased to report that, at this time, that $10 million is in the legislation progressing through the Vermont House and Senate.

April 9, 2021 Legislative Tourism Caucus Meeting

Economic Recovery Grant and Loan Programs - Status and Update

Guests:

Joan Goldstein, Commissioner, Vermont Department of Economic Development

Darcy Carter, Small Business Administration Vermont Office

Adam Grinold, Brattleboro Development Credit Corporation

This meeting was also an exceptionally informative one, as it was one at which we received status updates on all of the Economic Recovery Grant and Loan Programs that have been, and are, available to Vermont businesses and sole proprietors.

To be clear, in general at this time, the Legislature is still finalizing the legislation that will allow for more funding to flow to Vermont businesses, so those are not yet available. Please keep up-to-date via this Vermont Agency of Commerce and Community Development link for information as things progress.

The U.S. Small Business Administration, however, does still have available programs in place. These include the following:

Paycheck Protection Program

EIDL Program

Shuttered Venues Operators Grant Program

Finally, as I mention in a below section of this newsletter, the Vermont Sole Proprietor Stabilization Program Round 2 is now up and running.

If you are interested in more of our work on the tourism front, please feel free to follow the work of the Legislative Tourism Caucus.

Here is a link to our watch our weekly 8:00 a.m. Friday meetings.

As always, please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns about our work, or about the industry in general.

VERMONT EMERGENCY RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM

The new Vermont Emergency Rental Assistance Program is now up and running. I've pasted below some of the specifics of the program. But, please click on this link for more information and how to apply.

What is VERAP?

The Vermont Emergency Rental Assistance Program (VERAP) was created to help renters dealing with financial challenges related to the COVID-19 pandemic. For eligible households, the program offers rental and utility assistance to help Vermonters avoid eviction or loss of utility service. ERAP was established by the Consolidated Appropriations Act 2021.

What does VERAP include?

VERAP helps tenant households with paying rent, past-due rent balances (also known as arrears), utility and home energy costs, utility and home energy cost arrears, and other expenses related to housing. Rent expenses include rent, rent arrears. Utilities include separately stated electricity, gas, water, sewer, trash removal and energy costs, such as fuel oil.

Who is eligible for VERAP?

  • Must be obligated to pay rent on a residential dwelling in Vermont.

  • One or more adults in your household is unemployed and/or receiving unemployment benefits.

  • A household member has experienced a reduction in income, incurred significant costs, or financial hardship due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

  • You’re able to demonstrate risk of experiencing homelessness or housing instability.

  • The household has an income at or below 80% of area median income (AMI) Vermont Income Limits.

What are the benefits?

Rent

Back rent (arrears) to April 1, 2020

Utility bills, this includes electric and gas, fuel oil, wood and pellets

What documentation is needed?

Income tax document / W-2

Paystubs

Lease or rental agreement or letter of attestation from landlord

Utility bills

Eviction notice (If applicable)

Unemployment Approval Letter (If applicable)

As always, please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

VERMONT SOLE PROPRIETOR STABILIZATION PROGRAM

ROUND 2

Round 2 of the Vermont Sole Proprietor Stabilization Program is now open for applications.

This program is designed to assist sole proprietors with no employees that have been impacted by COVID-19 and have remaining unmet need. Grant amounts will range from $1,500 to $10,000 based on eligibility and the ability to document the unmet need.

April 5, 2021 - Application Opened

May 26, 2021 - Application Closes at 5:00 PM

Grants funds will be distributed on a rolling, first-come, first-serve basis

The eligibility criteria for this round of grants has been modified a bit - to include both Sole Proprietors with no W2 employees and S-Corp owners with no W2 employees.

Other key criteria include the following:

  • Be from a low- to moderate-income household per federal guidelines (household income of 80% or below the media income for your county)

  • Be a for-profit entity providing goods or services to clients

  • Have pre-pandemic or current gross annual revenues of over $24,450

  • Have been legally established prior to March 15, 2020

In order to prepare for your application, be sure you also have the following:

  • DUNS Number

  • 2018, 2019, and 2020 Federal Income Taxes as filed (State of Vermont Taxes are not required)

  • Documentation in PDF form proving the receipt of any other grant/loan monies for COVID-19 relief or received under CARES Act Funding

  • Proof of Residency

  • Invoices and proof of payment for business expenses you want reimbursed by this grant program

Please be in touch if you have any questions. I will do what I can to assist.

As always, if you have any questions or concerns, please contact me. I can be reached at 253-9314 or [email protected].