Vermont Business Magazine Today Vermont Secretary of State Jim Condos announced that the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s (MIT) Election Data & Science Lab has released its 2016 Elections Performance Index (EPI), ranking Vermont 1st overall in elections administration for the 2016 election. The EPI is widely considered by state election administrators as the most reputable elections management index, and provides a non-partisan, data-driven measure of how well each state is performing in managing its national elections work, using a number of indicators ranging from voter turnout to the availability of online tools for voter accessibility.
Vermont (86 percent) finished just ahead of Minnesota and Delaware. California, Oklahoma and Idaho (58 percent) rounded out the bottom. SEE FULL LIST BELOW.
“I’m very proud of the hard work our office and our Elections Division team have done to achieve a 1st overall ranking in the EPI” said Secretary of State Jim Condos. “What this ranking means is that across numerous measures we have increased accessibility, and decreased roadblocks, for Vermont voters, while ensuring that our elections process is functioning effectively as the bedrock of our democracy.”
Since the 2012 ranking, Vermont has moved from 38th nationally, to 16th in the 2014 ranking, to a first-place overall score, rising from 74% to 86% performance across all indicators.
“It is always exciting for us to see scores improve for a state that has worked hard to better its election administration,” said Charles Stewart III, founding director of the MIT Election Data & Science Lab and Kenan Sahin Distinguished Professor of Political Science at MIT. “Vermont is committed to making election processes more accessible, convenient, and secure for voters - in particular through its adoption of online tools - and we commend them for their efforts.”
Almost all states improved their index scores in the 2016 election, compared to 2012. While comparative rankings may change each new index, the EPI provides objective measurements and data on state efforts to improve elections management practices, and can highlight key areas of improvement that may be needed.
“Our focus has been, and will continue to be, making our election systems as accessible and secure for Vermont voters as possible,” said Condos. “Our #1 overall ranking and performance increase show that we’re on the right path, and we will keep working daily to innovate and improve.”
| Vermont 1 | |
| Minnesota 2 | |
| Delaware 3 | |
| North Dakota 4 | |
| Nevada 5 | |
| Washington, DC 6 | |
| Illinois 7 | |
| Massachusetts 8 | |
| Wisconsin 9 | |
| Connecticut 10 | |
| Nebraska 11 | |
| Pennsylvania 12 | |
| Virginia 13 | |
| South Carolina 14 | |
| Iowa 15 | |
| Missouri 16 | |
| Alaska 17 | |
| Maryland 18 | |
| West Virginia 19 | |
| Washington 20 | |
| Ohio 21 | |
| Louisiana 22 | |
| Michigan 23 | |
| Colorado 24 | |
| Montana 25 | |
| Indiana 26 | |
| North Carolina 27 | |
| Rhode Island 28 | |
| New Mexico 29 | |
| Wyoming 30 | |
| Florida 31 | |
| Oregon 32 | |
| New Hampshire 33 | |
| Georgia 34 | |
| Arizona 35 | |
| Maine 36 | |
| Texas 37 | |
| Utah 38 | |
| Hawaii 39 | |
| New Jersey 40 | |
| Tennessee 41 | |
| New York 42 | |
| Mississippi 43 | |
| Kentucky 44 | |
| South Dakota 45 | |
| Alabama 46 | |
| Arkansas 47 | |
| Kansas 48 | |
| California 49 | |
| Oklahoma 50 | |
| Idaho 51 |
The Elections Performance Index and complete 2016 data can be viewed at http://elections.mit.edu/.
Source: Secretary of State 8.10.2018
