Vermont ranks in top three for personal income growth

Vermont Business Magazine Another economic data point ranks Vermont among the best in the nation. State personal income increased 0.8 percent on average in the US in the first quarter of 2014, an acceleration from the 0.5 percent growth in the fourth quarter of 2013, according to estimates released Tuesday by the US Bureau of Economic Analysis. Personal income grew in 46 states and growth accelerated in 24 of those states. The fastest growth, 1.4 percent, was in Washington state, Vermont, and West Virginia. Personal income fell 2.9 percent in North Dakota, 0.3 percent in South Dakota, and 0.2 percent in Arkansas and Nebraska. Inflation, as measured by the national price index for personal consumption expenditures, was 0.3 percent in the first quarter, the same as in the fourth quarter. Meanwhile, Vermont's unemployment rate is second lowest in the nation at 3.3 percent (behind only North Dakota) and Vermont is at its highest per capita income ($45,783)and rank (19th) since statistics were first compiled in 1929 (see table below).

RELATED:Vermont unemployment rate holds steady at 3.3 percent in May

Map of US

Personal current transfer receipts.Nationally, personal current transfer receipts increased $41.1 billion in the first quarter of 2014, compared with an increase of $4.3 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013. The first-quarter estimates of current transfer receipts reflected several special factors. Social security benefits, which increased $15.5 billion, were boosted by a 1.5 percent cost-of-living adjustment. Medicaid benefits, which increased $22.3 billion, were boosted by expanded coverage under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Other current transfer receipts increased $16.7 billion, reflecting increases in several refundable tax credits, including health insurance premium subsidies paid in the form of tax credits to enrollees of the ACA exchanges. For additional information, see the FAQ on "How will the Affordable Care Act affect BEA’s measure of personal income and outlays?" at www.bea.gov. These increases in current transfer receipts were partly offset by a $16.8 billion decrease in state unemployment insurance (UI) benefits, reflecting the expiration of the Emergency Unemployment Compensation program.

Earnings by state and industry.Overall, earnings grew $79.5 billion in the first quarter of 2014, after increasing $75.1 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013. Earnings grew in 19 of the 24 industries for which BEA prepares quarterly estimates, with the largest increases in professional services ($22.1 billion), construction ($19.4 billion), and finance ($9.2 billion).

Mining earnings grew $8.6 billion in the first quarter, compared with a $2.5 billion increase in the fourth quarter. More than half of the mining earnings growth (which includes earnings in the oil and gas industry) was in Texas. The contribution of mining to earnings growth was larger than every other industry in eight states including Texas, North Dakota, and West Virginia.

Construction earnings grew $19.4 billion in the first quarter, more than double the $9.5 billion fourth-quarter increase. More than one-fourth of this growth was in Texas and California. Construction made a larger contribution to earnings growth than any other industry in 20 states including Nevada and Utah.

Earnings fell in five industries: farming ($16.4 billion), information ($9.2 billion), management of companies ($2.6 billion), durable goods manufacturing ($1.7 billion), and forestry ($0.1 billion).

About half of the first-quarter farm earnings decline was in, or adjacent to, the Plains region. First-quarter farm earnings declined more than $1 billion in North Dakota, Minnesota, Iowa, Arkansas, and Nebraska. The declines reflect falling crop prices.

Information earnings fell $9.2 billion in the first quarter after rising $14.3 billion in the fourth quarter. Earnings declined $11.1 billion in six states and grew $1.9 billion elsewhere. California’s $11.0 billion first-quarter decline followed a $15.5 billion fourth-quarter increase that included special lump-sum bonuses.

Durable goods manufacturing earnings fell $1.7 billion in the first quarter, following a $2.2 billion increase in the fourth quarter. Bonuses and other special pay contributed to a $1.4 billion first-quarter rise in Washington, the first increase in that state in a year.

Definitions

Personal incomeis the income received by all persons from all sources. Personal income is the sum of net earnings by place of residence, property income, and personal current transfer receipts.Property incomeis rental income of persons, personal dividend income, and personal interest income.Net earningsis earnings by place of work (the sum of wages and salaries, supplements to wages and salaries, and proprietors’ income) less contributions for government social insurance, plus an adjustment to convert earnings by place of work to a place-of-residence basis. Personal income is measured before the deduction of personal income taxes and other personal taxes and is reported in current dollars (no adjustment is made for price changes).

The estimate of personal income in the United States is derived as the sum of the state estimates and the estimate for the District of Columbia; it differs from the estimate of personal income in the national income and product accounts (NIPAs) because of differences in coverage, in the methodologies used to prepare the estimates, and in the timing of the availability of source data.

BEA groups all 50 states and the District of Columbia into eight distinct regions for purposes of data collecting and analyses:New England(Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont);Mideast(Delaware, District of Columbia, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania);Great Lakes(Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin);Plains(Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota);Southeast(Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia);Southwest(Arizona, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas);Rocky Mountain(Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wyoming); andFar West(Alaska, California, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington).

State personal income statistics provide a framework for analyzing current economic conditions in each state and can serve as a basis for decision making. For example:

Federal government agencies use the statistics as a basis for allocating funds and determining matching grants to states. The statistics are also used in forecasting models to project energy and water use.

  • State governments use the statistics to project tax revenues and the need for public services.
  • Academic regional economists use the statistics for applied research.
  • Businesses, trade associations, and labor organizations use the statistics for market research.

BEA's national, international, regional, and industry estimates; theSurvey of Current Business; and BEA news releases are available without charge on BEA's Web site atwww.bea.gov. By visiting the site, you can also subscribe to receive free e-mail summaries of BEA releases and announcements.

Revisions.Estimates for 2013:I to 2013:IV have been revised. All of the regional statistics underlying this news release, along with mapping and charting applications, are available athttp://bea.gov/regional/

NOTE.— Quarter-to-quarter percent changes are calculated from unrounded data and are not annualized. Quarterly estimates are expressed at seasonally adjusted annual rates, unless otherwise specified. Quarter-to-quarter dollar changes are differences between published estimates.

Per Capita Personal Income
Vermont and United States
1929-2013
Vermont Department of Labor, Economic & Labor Market Information
(p) - preliminary estimate
Year United States Vermont
$ $ % of U.S. rank
view graph
2013 (p) 44,543 45,783 102.8% 19
2012 43,735 44,545 101.9% 21
2011 42,298 42,911 101.4% 21
2010 40,163 40,126 99.9% 21
2009 39,357 39,527 100.4% 20
2008 40,873 40,148 98.2% 23
2007 39,804 38,675 97.2% 21
2006 38,127 36,768 96.4% 21
2005 35,888 34,530 96.2% 22
2004 34,300 33,742 98.4% 21
2003 32,676 31,862 97.5% 22
2002 31,798 30,554 96.1% 23
2001 31,524 29,977 95.1% 23
2000 30,319 28,196 93.0% 29
1999 28,333 26,268 92.7% 30
1998 27,258 24,921 91.4% 32
1997 25,654 23,168 90.3% 33
1996 24,442 22,106 90.4% 34
1995 23,262 21,057 90.5% 33
1994 22,297 20,255 90.8% 33
1993 21,385 19,446 90.9% 31
1992 20,799 18,941 91.1% 30
1991 19,818 17,869 90.2% 29
1990 19,354 17,643 91.2% 27
1989 18,402 17,195 93.4% 22
1988 17,244 15,822 91.8% 26
1987 16,137 14,755 91.4% 28
1986 15,338 13,731 89.5% 33
1985 14,637 12,867 87.9% 34
1984 13,807 11,977 86.7% 35
1983 12,583 10,930 86.9% 35
1982 11,901 10,324 86.7% 36
1981 11,209 9,650 86.1% 36
1980 10,091 8,599 85.2% 36
1979 9,138 7,756 84.9% 38
1978 8,243 6,979 84.7% 38
1977 7,402 6,153 83.1% 39
1976 6,754 5,747 85.1% 37
1975 6,172 5,203 84.3% 37
1974 5,708 4,855 85.1% 37
1973 5,230 4,528 86.6% 36
1972 4,717 4,163 88.3% 34
1971 4,340 3,848 88.7% 31
1970 4,084 3,625 88.8% 32
1969 3,836 3,380 88.1% 31
1968 3,536 3,121 88.3% 30
1967 3,253 2,878 88.5% 30
1966 3,061 2,722 88.9% 28
1965 2,849 2,452 86.1% 34
1964 2,671 2,264 84.8% 34
1963 2,526 2,125 84.1% 36
1962 2,439 2,068 84.8% 37
1961 2,326 1,986 85.4% 33
1960 2,268 1,913 84.3% 34
1959 2,206 1,816 82.3% 38
1958 2,108 1,720 81.6% 40
1957 2,087 1,704 81.6% 37
1956 2,013 1,639 81.4% 36
1955 1,906 1,508 79.1% 39
1954 1,810 1,438 79.4% 39
1953 1,826 1,416 77.5% 39
1952 1,751 1,365 78.0% 38
1951 1,667 1,321 79.2% 38
1950 1,503 1,153 76.7% 39
1949 1,382 1,108 80.2% 38
1948 1,425 1,186 83.2% 35
1947 1,317 1,119 85.0% 35
1946 1,254 1,083 86.4% 33
1945 1,235 1,031 83.5% 34
1944 1,194 950 79.6% 35
1943 1,106 929 84.0% 34
1942 908 770 84.8% 33
1941 717 640 89.3% 22
1940 593 513 86.5% 26
1939 556 487 87.6% 27
1938 526 453 86.1% 27
1937 574 482 84.0% 28
1936 535 466 87.1% 24
1935 473 411 86.9% 27
1934 424 378 89.2% 20
1933 372 334 89.8% 20
1932 398 359 90.2% 22
1931 525 469 89.3% 21
1930 618 569 92.1% 21
1929 697 628 90.1% 20
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Anaylsis
www.bea.gov
released: March 25, 2014
Last updated: 3/28/2014